ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Predictive value of procalcitonin for the therapeutic response of patients with uroseptic shock: a retrospective case-control study.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the predictive value of procalcitonin (PCT) in assessing the therapeutic response of patients with uroseptic shock.
methodsThis retrospective case-control study included 220 patients treated for uroseptic shock at Liyang People's Hospital between January 2018 and December 2023. Patients were classified into high-risk (HR) (n = 116) and low-risk (LR) (n = 104) groups based on their Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores after 14 days of treatment. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected, and PCT levels were measured using chemiluminescence. Correlation analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used to assess the predictive value of PCT.
resultsThe HR group had significantly higher PCT levels (25.33 ± 5.32 ng/mL) compared to the LR group (18.47 ± 2.88 ng/mL, P < 0.001). Elevated PCT levels were strongly correlated with poor therapeutic response (rho = -0.635, P < 0.001). Other markers, including hypertension (rho = -0.207, P = 0.002), CRP (rho = -0.224, P < 0.001), IL-6 (rho = -0.200, P = 0.003), TNF-α (rho = -0.151, P = 0.025), NEUT% (rho = -0.208, P = 0.002), GGT (rho = -0.160, P = 0.017), and BUN (rho = -0.198, P = 0.003), also showed significant negative correlations with treatment outcome. Conversely, PLT (rho = 0.156, P = 0.021) and the CD4+/CD8+ ratio (rho = 0.242, P < 0.001) were positively correlated with better treatment outcome. ROC analysis revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.867 for PCT, indicating its strong predictive value.
conclusionsPCT level is a robust predictor of therapeutic response in uroseptic shock patients and may be integrated into clinical protocols for sepsis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.