ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2025
Effect of interference electrotherapy combined with rotary traction manipulation on cervical function and recurrence in patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the clinical efficacy of combining interference electrotherapy with rotary traction manipulation in treating cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), and to assess its impact on cervical function and prognosis.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data from 214 CSR patients who were treated at Yueyang Central Hospital, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, from April 2021 to October 2023. The observation group (n=110) received combined therapy using interference electrotherapy and rotary traction manipulation, while the control group (n=104) received rotary traction manipulation alone. Before treatment, and at 2 and 4 weeks post-treatment, cervical function was assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and pain intensity was measured using components of the Simplified McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), including Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Present Pain Intensity (PPI), and Pain Rating Index (PRI). Clinical efficacy was evaluated using the modified Macnab criteria, and treatment safety was assessed. Both groups were followed up for one year to record recurrence rates. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for recurrence.
resultsBaseline characteristics were similar between groups (P>0.05). After 2 and 4 weeks, the observation group showed significantly greater improvements in NDI, VAS, PRI, and PPI scores compared to the control group (P<0.001). The total effective rate was higher in the observation group (92.7%) than in the control group (80.8%) (P=0.017). However, the recurrence rate was significantly higher in the observation group (7.3%) compared to the control group (20.2%) (P=0.006). Logistic regression identified treatment regimen, patient age, and pillow height as independent risk factors for recurrence (P<0.05). A recurrence risk scoring model based on these factors achieved an AUC of 0.897 (95% CI: 0.844-0.951).
conclusionCombining interference electrotherapy with rotary traction manipulation significantly improves cervical function and alleviates pain in CSR patients, yielding higher overall efficacy. However, this combination is associated with an increased risk of recurrence, influenced by treatment method, patient age, and pillow height.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.