ArticleClinical hematology international2025
Efficacy and safety of primary letermovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in paediatric patients undergoing allogeneic transplantation: a single-centre, retrospective, real-world analysis.
Article in Clinical hematology international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a common and life-threatening complication following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Letermovir (LET) has been the standard prophylaxis for adult recipients, but studies in children remain limited. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed children with or without LET prophylaxis after haploidentical donor (HID) for the Beijing protocol or unrelated cord blood (UCB) transplantation. Results: Of the 151 patients, 67 received LET, including 35 HID recipients and 32 UCB recipients. During the 180 days after transplantation, we found that the LET group had a lower incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (csCMVi) than the non-LET group (13.4% vs. 56.0%, P＜0.001). In the LET group, later LET administration was identified as a risk factor for the occurrence of csCMVi (HR: 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01 - 1.14, P=0.029). Further, the HID subgroup had a lower incidence of csCMVi during follow-up than the UCB subgroup (2.9% vs. 25.0%, P=0.009). In terms of safety, the incidence and severity of adverse events, overall survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, relapse free survival, nonrelapse mortality and graft versus host disease-free, relapse-free survival were similar between the two groups. Conclusion: LET is effective and safe in preventing csCMVi among Chinese children undergoing allo-HSCT. Compared to UCB recipients, children undergoing HID transplantation for the Beijing protocol develop less scCMVi up to 180 days post-HSCT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.