ArticleCureus2025
Demographic Differences in the Surgical Management of Tibial Shaft Fractures: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Tibial shaft fractures (TSFs) are the most common long bone fractures in the United States and are associated with significant morbidity and the potential need for revision surgeries, with many patients requiring reoperation. This can have significant physical, mental, and financial impacts on patients. A major complication faced by patients with TSF is nonunion (TSFN). The mainstay of surgical management of TSF is Intramedullary Nail (IMN), with some patients also being treated with Open Reduction Internal Fixation (ORIF). With the demographic makeup of the United States undergoing rapid change, a better understanding of patient characteristics of patients with TSF is useful to optimize patient care. This study aims to enhance our comprehension of the frequency and demographic variables associated with tibia fracture surgery and subsequent nonunion. Methods A retrospective study was conducted in August 2023, utilizing the TriNetX "Global Collaborative Network" database to form patient study cohorts. Data extracted included patient age, sex, ethnicity, race, smoking status, surgical management, and nonunion. Data was also extracted on specific surgical management utilized, comprising either IMN or ORIF. Results A total of 6,389 cases of TSFs were analyzed, with 65% (4,153) of patients undergoing ORIF compared to IMN (35%, or 2,236). The overall incidence of patients with TSF ORIF and IMN was highest among males and White patients. The incidence of patients with TSF ORIF was highest in the age groups of 40-64 and 64-90 years, while TSF IMN was highest in the age groups of 18-39 and 40-64 years. The overall rate of tibia nonunion among patients with a TSF ORIF was 4.6%, vs. 2.6% in patients who underwent IMN. Conclusion TSFs treated with IMN were found to have lower rates of nonunion compared to ORIF. IMN of TSF was more common in younger patients, while ORIF was more common in the older age groups. ORIF and IMN had similar rates of male-to-female utilization, indicating that both genders are being treated similarly with regard to the operative method of choice. White patients and those who were not Hispanic or Latino had much higher rates of both IMN and ORIF compared to all other racial groups, despite the increased complexity of fracture/injury characteristics and higher complication rates in minority patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.