ArticleCureus2025
Chemotherapy-Associated Cardiotoxicity: A Silent Threat Evidenced in a Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Early detection of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity in lymphoma patients: RT-3DE/2D-STI and predictive role of LAEFa/LASr.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAt present, cancer represents one of the main causes of mortality both globally and in Colombia, with a growing trend that could position it as the leading cause of death shortly, surpassing other diseases of great health impact. Cardiotoxicity associated with antineoplastic treatments can manifest itself at different times, either during the administration of chemotherapy or sometime after its completion, becoming evident only when clinical complications such as heart failure have developed. Therefore, it is essential to use diagnostic tools to identify patients at greater risk of developing cardiotoxicity associated with administering chemotherapeutic agents.
methodsWe conducted a descriptive observational cohort study, which included patients over 18 years of age with an active diagnosis of cancer, both of hematological or nonhematological origin, who were treated in a university hospital in Colombia between 2016 and 2019.
resultsOne hundred ninety-seven patients were included, with a mean age of 53. During follow-up, 20 patients (10%) developed cardiotoxicity, with an incidence density of 3.64% person-months. Dyslipidemia was the most prevalent comorbidity (45%), followed by arterial hypertension (28.7%). Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma was the most frequent oncologic diagnosis (40.3%), with an incidence of cardiotoxicity of 13%. Patients exposed to anthracyclines had a higher incidence of cardiotoxicity (11.8%) compared to those not exposed (5.7%), with a relative risk of 2.074 (95% confidence interval = 1.91-2.24). The left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in patients with cardiotoxicity (55.3%) compared to those without cardiotoxicity (62.1%) (p = 0.029).
conclusionsTaking into account the usefulness of echocardiography and the use of biomarkers found in this study and referred to in the literature, we can determine that these studies, far from being routine, are one of the main strategies that the clinician has to favor the early and timely identification of those patients who are developing a cardiotoxic effect; therefore, it is essential to include these tools in the algorithms of care as a model of serial monitoring. This is not only to reduce the incidence of cardiotoxicity but also as part of an integral management of the oncologic patient to increase the efficiency of pharmacological treatment and improve the quality of life of the patients treated in the short, medium, and long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.