ArticleCureus2025
Validity and Reliability of a Noninvasive Device for Measuring Laryngeal Movement During Swallowing.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Laryngeal movement plays a crucial role in the process of swallowing. Peak velocity of laryngeal movement has been shown to be useful in predicting laryngeal penetration and aspiration. There is a growing need to accurately capture and quantify laryngeal movements during swallowing. Objective This research comprises two investigations that aim to verify and establish the reliability of a noninvasive device designed to measure laryngeal movement during swallowing. Methods In Step 1, one healthy male in his 30s underwent simultaneous videofluoroscopy (VF) examination and noninvasive device measurement. VF videos were employed to generate laryngeal movement curves using video analysis software. In Step 2, 19 healthy young adult men (20-39 years old) and 19 healthy older men (60-79 years old) were instructed to perform five saliva swallows each, with a noninvasive device placed against their necks. Results In Step 1, the comparison of laryngeal movement curves between VF and the noninvasive device exhibited almost perfect agreement for upward-downward movement, with less agreement noted for anterior-posterior movement. In Step 2, the reliability of the measurements of peak velocity and distance traveled in Nodomiru showed moderate to high reliability for single measurements (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (1,1) = 0.598-0.855) and high reliability for the average of five measurements (ICC (1,5) = 0.694-0.967). Conclusions The results of this study suggest that it is possible to measure the upward-downward movement of the larynx in healthy men using a noninvasive device.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.