ArticleCureus2025
A Perilous Plunge: A Unique Case of Rectal Foreign Body.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Case Report: Transanal extraction combined with wound management for a broken glass foreign body and associated rectal injuries.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal foreign bodies (RFBs) are foreign bodies in the rectum that pose a challenge to the surgeons in the emergency department. We report a case of an RFB; the patient was a 30-year-old man who put a glass bottle into his rectum on his own. The 10-cm bottle was successfully retrieved through the transanal approach without complication. The patient had no sign of injury or bleeding after the procedure. The patient was stable and was discharged with counseling to avoid such conduct. An effective approach for extraction is to have a structured protocol encompassing prompt diagnosis, extraction techniques, and post-removal assessment. In addition, there is a psychological aspect to RFBs that requires counseling and patient education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.