ArticleCureus2025
A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Results: The hinotori™ Robotic System Versus the da Vinci® Surgical System in Simple Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Diseases.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Simple hysterectomy (SH) is a frequently performed surgery for treating benign uterine conditions. The da Vinci® Surgical System (dVSS; Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, California, US) received FDA approval in 2005 for robot-assisted minimally invasive gynecological surgeries. In Japan, insurance coverage for dVSS applications in benign uterine conditions, such as uterine myomas, began in 2018, driving a sharp rise in robotic procedures. The hinotori™ Surgical Robot System (hinotori; Medicaroid Corporation, Kobe, Japan), developed in Japan, was introduced in 2020. This study compares the operative results of SH performed by the hinotori and the dVSS. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent SH for benign disease at Kagoshima University Hospital between 2017 and 2024. Surgical parameters, including operation times, cockpit or console times, and complication rates, were compared across the two systems. Results Median operation times and cockpit or console times for the hinotori were comparable to those of the dVSS, with no statistical differences observed. However, roll-in to cockpit or console initiation was significantly longer for the hinotori (P = 0.024) while hospital stays were notably shorter. Conversion rates to laparotomy and operative complications showed no significant differences among the groups. Conclusions The hinotori demonstrated surgical results equivalent to the dVSS, supporting its safety and effectiveness in SH for benign uterine conditions. Further studies are recommended to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.