Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40092002›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

A Comparative Analysis of Surgical Results: The hinotori™ Robotic System Versus the da Vinci® Surgical System in Simple Hysterectomy for Benign Uterine Diseases.

Shinichi Togami, Furuzono Nozomi, Chikako Nagata, Mika Mizuno, Hiroaki Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shinichi TogamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, JPN.
Furuzono NozomiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, JPN.
Chikako NagataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, JPN.
Mika MizunoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, JPN.
Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Simple hysterectomy (SH) is a frequently performed surgery for treating benign uterine conditions. The da Vinci® Surgical System (dVSS; Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, California, US) received FDA approval in 2005 for robot-assisted minimally invasive gynecological surgeries. In Japan, insurance coverage for dVSS applications in benign uterine conditions, such as uterine myomas, began in 2018, driving a sharp rise in robotic procedures. The hinotori™ Surgical Robot System (hinotori; Medicaroid Corporation, Kobe, Japan), developed in Japan, was introduced in 2020. This study compares the operative results of SH performed by the hinotori and the dVSS. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on 40 patients who underwent SH for benign disease at Kagoshima University Hospital between 2017 and 2024. Surgical parameters, including operation times, cockpit or console times, and complication rates, were compared across the two systems. Results Median operation times and cockpit or console times for the hinotori were comparable to those of the dVSS, with no statistical differences observed. However, roll-in to cockpit or console initiation was significantly longer for the hinotori (P = 0.024) while hospital stays were notably shorter. Conversion rates to laparotomy and operative complications showed no significant differences among the groups. Conclusions The hinotori demonstrated surgical results equivalent to the dVSS, supporting its safety and effectiveness in SH for benign uterine conditions. Further studies are recommended to confirm these results.

Indexed as

benign uterine diseaseshinotorirobotic surgerysimple hysterectomysurgical robot system

Identifiers

PMID40092002
PMCPMC11910715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.