ArticleCureus2025
Cesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study of Ultrasound-Guided Suction Evacuation From Saudi Arabia.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives Globally, as rates of cesarean section increase, so do the rates of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies. The objective of this study is to describe our experiences in managing cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) in King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital. Method This retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdullah Bin Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The study included women of reproductive age who presented with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSEP) and a diagnosis confirmed by the transvaginal ultrasound. The suction evacuation was performed by ultrasound-guided suction evacuation. All the relevant data was retrieved from medical records. Results We reported ten CSEPs managed by ultrasound-guided suction evacuation. All ten patients successfully underwent ultrasound-guided suction evacuation for CSEP without complications. Most of the patients experienced minimal blood loss, except one case developed excessive blood loss, which was controlled by balloon tamponade. All the patients were dischargeable on the same day of the procedure or the following day, and they experienced a significant decrease in beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) levels, ultimately reaching undetectable levels, apart from one case in which the histopathology confirmed partial molar pregnancy and is still undergoing follow-up by beta-HCG till the date of study publication. All patients were discharged with advice for an early scan in subsequent pregnancies. The study revealed ultrasound-guided suction evacuation's effectiveness, safety, and advantages as a minimally invasive and reasonable approach to managing early CSEP. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided suction evacuation can be safely and effectively applied to CSEP management, and it remains one of the most cost-effective methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.