ArticleCureus2025
Stature Estimation From Fragments of Femur in South Indian Population.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stature estimation is an essential component of forensic anthropology, particularly in identifying individuals in scenarios involving fragmented skeletal remains, such as disasters or legal investigations. This study focuses on deriving regression equations for stature estimation using femoral fragments from the South Indian population. A total of 162 dry femora (96 left and 66 right) were analyzed, measuring parameters including maximum femur length, proximal and distal segments, bicondylar breadth, and various girths. The mean total femur length was 44.31 ± 3.08 cm for left femora and 44.13 ± 2.67 cm for right femora. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a very strong correlation (r ≥ 0.8) with shaft length for both sides, while moderate correlations (r = 0.6-0.8) were observed with parameters such as the proximal segment, girth of the middle shaft, and breadth of the neck. Regression equations were developed for parameters with significant correlations, enabling accurate stature estimation. The findings underscore the necessity of population-specific data for forensic applications, as skeletal dimensions vary significantly across ethnicities due to genetic, nutritional, and lifestyle factors. The regression model for stature estimation demonstrated high reliability, with R² values reaching 0.91 for shaft length. Additionally, the results align with previous studies on other Indian populations while also highlighting unique regional variations. Despite its strengths, the study is limited by the lack of gender differentiation and demographic diversity, which may affect the generalizability of the findings. These results provide valuable insights for medico-legal investigations and orthopedic applications, offering a robust framework for stature estimation in the South Indian population. Future research should explore advanced statistical techniques and include broader demographic parameters to enhance the precision and applicability of the findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.