ArticleCureus2025
Examining Disparities in the Evaluation and Management of Cesarean Birth Pain Among Patients With and Without a Psychiatric Condition.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain management is an important aspect of postpartum care following cesarean delivery (CD). This study aimed to determine whether differences exist in pain assessments and opioid administration after CD between patients with psychiatric illness and those without. Methodology This was a retrospective cohort study of 490 patients who underwent CD at an urban tertiary care center. Demographic and delivery data were collected by chart review. The primary outcomes were the number of pain assessments performed, average pain score, and amount of morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) administered to patients with and without psychiatric illness. Results A total of 389 patients without a psychiatric diagnosis were compared to 101 patients with a psychiatric diagnosis. After adjusting for baseline characteristics in all models, psychiatric history had a significant effect on pain severity (β = 0.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.00, 0.49); p = 0.046) and number of pain assessments (β = -2.41; 95% CI (-4.42, -0.41); p = 0.018), but not on MME administration (incidence rate ratio = 1.31; 95% CI (0.60, 2.92); p = 0.466). Patients with a psychiatric history reported more severe pain after CD and received fewer pain assessments. There was no significant difference in the amount of pain medication administered between groups. Conclusions In this study, patients with a psychiatric diagnosis received fewer pain assessments and reported more severe post-CD pain compared to those without. Despite this difference, both groups received similar amounts of pain medication, raising concern for bias and inadequate treatment of pain in patients with a psychiatric diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.