ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025
AI model for predicting asthma prognosis in children.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A lifecycle governance and learning health system framework for trustworthy, generalizable, and sustainable human-ai partnership in clinical practice: Lessons from the asthma-guidance and prediction system (A-GPS).Journal of the National Medical Association · 2026Review
- Evolution, hotspots, and future directions of artificial intelligence in asthma research: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis [2016-2026].Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Improving machine-learning development in allergology: bridging the gap between open-access and cohort-based databases.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026Review
- The evolution of scientific knowledge in childhood asthma over time.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Childhood asthma often continues into adulthood, but some children experience remission. Utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to predict asthma prognosis can aid health care providers and patients in developing effective prioritized care plans. Objective: We aimed to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models using various clinical variables extracted from EHRs to predict childhood asthma prognosis (remission vs no remission) in different age groups. Methods: We developed AI models utilizing patients' EHRs during the first 6, 9, or 12 years of their lives to predict their asthma prognosis status at ages 6 to 9, 9 to 12, or 12 to 15 years, respectively. We first developed the models based on a manually annotated birth cohort (n = 900). We then leveraged a larger birth cohort (n = 29,594) labeled automatically (with weak labels) by a previously validated natural language processing algorithm for asthma prognosis. Different models (logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost [eXtreme Gradient Boosting]) were tested with diverse clinical variables from structured and unstructured EHRs. Results: The best AI models of each age group produced a prediction performance with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.93. The prediction model at age 12 showed the highest performance. Most of the AI models with weak labels showed enhanced performance, and models using the top 10 variables performed similarly to those using all of the variables. Conclusions: The AI models effectively predicted asthma prognosis for children by using EHRs with a relatively small number of variables. This approach demonstrates the potential to enhance prioritized care plans and patient education, improving disease management and quality of life for asthmatic patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.