Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091884›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global2025

AI model for predicting asthma prognosis in children.

Elham Sagheb, Chung-Il Wi, Katherine S King, Bhavani Singh Agnikula Kshatriya, Euijung Ryu, Hongfang Liu, Miguel A Park, Hee Yun Seol, Shauna M Overgaard, Deepak K Sharma and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The evolution of scientific knowledge in childhood asthma over time.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Elham SaghebDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Chung-Il WiDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Katherine S KingDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Bhavani Singh Agnikula KshatriyaCenter for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Euijung RyuDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Hongfang LiuDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Miguel A ParkDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Hee Yun SeolDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan-si, Korea.
Shauna M OvergaardCenter for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Deepak K SharmaCenter for Digital Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Young J JuhnDepartment of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Sunghwan SohnDepartment of Artificial Intelligence and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Funding

Identification and characterization of children with asthma-associated comorbidities through computational and immune phenotypingR01HL126667 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JUHN, YOUNG J, LIU, HONGFANG · 2015 to 2022
$4.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood asthma often continues into adulthood, but some children experience remission. Utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) to predict asthma prognosis can aid health care providers and patients in developing effective prioritized care plans. Objective: We aimed to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models using various clinical variables extracted from EHRs to predict childhood asthma prognosis (remission vs no remission) in different age groups. Methods: We developed AI models utilizing patients' EHRs during the first 6, 9, or 12 years of their lives to predict their asthma prognosis status at ages 6 to 9, 9 to 12, or 12 to 15 years, respectively. We first developed the models based on a manually annotated birth cohort (n = 900). We then leveraged a larger birth cohort (n = 29,594) labeled automatically (with weak labels) by a previously validated natural language processing algorithm for asthma prognosis. Different models (logistic regression, random forest, and XGBoost [eXtreme Gradient Boosting]) were tested with diverse clinical variables from structured and unstructured EHRs. Results: The best AI models of each age group produced a prediction performance with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve ranging from 0.85 to 0.93. The prediction model at age 12 showed the highest performance. Most of the AI models with weak labels showed enhanced performance, and models using the top 10 variables performed similarly to those using all of the variables. Conclusions: The AI models effectively predicted asthma prognosis for children by using EHRs with a relatively small number of variables. This approach demonstrates the potential to enhance prioritized care plans and patient education, improving disease management and quality of life for asthmatic patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceAsthmaasthma prognosisdynamic variableselectronic health recordsmachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID40091884
PMCPMC11908553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.