Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091674›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2025

Systematic review of risk factors for violence in psychosis: 10-year update.

Tyra Lagerberg, Sinéad Lambe, Anabelle Paulino, Rongqin Yu, Seena Fazel

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Forensic mental health service use in early psychosis: A scoping review.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tyra LagerbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK and Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2480-0216
Sinéad LambeDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Anabelle PaulinoDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rongqin YuDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7315-3348
Seena FazelDepartment of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; and Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5383-5365

Funding

Wellcome Trust 02836/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 202836
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding risk factors for violence in people with psychosis can inform risk management and violence prevention. However, much of the evidence comes from cross-sectional studies, and previous reviews require updating.

aimsTo synthesise evidence from longitudinal studies on risk factors for violence in people with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders, bipolar disorder or other affective psychoses.

methodWe searched five bibliographic databases up to June 2022. We identified longitudinal studies reporting risk factors for violence in individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia or other psychoses using DSM or ICD criteria. If ≥3 independent samples reported a risk factor, we conducted random-effects meta-analyses to provide a pooled estimate. We also meta-analysed risk factors by major domains.

resultsWe identified 47 longitudinal studies on risk factors for violence in psychosis, representing 41 independent samples - 21 from the original and 20 from the updated review - and 203 297 individuals. A total of 30 risk factors were present in ≥3 independent samples. Criminal history factors were associated with the greatest risk of violent outcomes (pooled odds ratio 3.50, 95% CI = 2.37, 5.16), followed by substance misuse factors (odds ratio 2.36, 95% CI = 1.99, 2.80). Many treatment-related factors were protective (odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI = 0.34, 0.85). Effect estimates were attenuated in inpatient settings. We also identified novel risk factors, including cannabis use, in a secondary analysis (odds ratio 3.34, 95% CI = 2.32, 4.82).

conclusionsUsing longitudinal evidence, we have validated comorbid substance misuse and criminal history as major risk factors for violence in psychosis. Novel factors such as cannabis use need further replication. Several identified factors are possible intervention targets if associations are found to be causal.

Indexed as

Psychotic DisordersSchizophreniaViolenceHumansLongitudinal StudiesRisk FactorsSubstance-Related Disorderspsychosisrisk factorsSystematic reviewviolence

Identifiers

PMID40091674
PMCPMC7617503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.