Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091631›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025

The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the AWESCORE Test.

Burak Yıldız, Özge Keniş-Coşkun, Tuğçe Kızıltepe, Evrim Karadağ-Saygı, Pınar Ergenekon, Ela Erdem-Eralp, Yasemin Gökdemir, Bülent Karadağ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Burak YıldızDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0000-2859-3862
Özge Keniş-CoşkunDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-3004-1992
Tuğçe KızıltepeDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0004-9150-8818
Evrim Karadağ-SaygıDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-7420-9902
Pınar ErgenekonDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0228-9832
Ela Erdem-EralpDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8829-3431
Yasemin GökdemirDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0853-7932
Bülent KaradağDepartment of Pediatric Pulmonology, Marmara University Medical Faculty, İstanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0003-0605-8871

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Patient-reported quality of life (QoL) measurement is crucial in making clinical decisions in unison with the patients. The current gold standard for cystic fibrosis (CF) is the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), which has different applications for different age groups and requires a computer program to be evaluated. There is a need for a straightforward way to evaluate QoL in both pediatric and adult patients with CF. The study aims to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Alfred Wellness Score (AWESCORE) test that has been developed to evaluate QoL in patients with CF. Materials and Methods: This study is a methodological study. The AWESCORE form was translated into Turkish and was applied to patients above 10 years of age. It includes 10 questions. Each question was scored using a numerical rating scale of 0-10. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. Test-retest reliability was assessed over 24 hours. To determine validity, comparisons were sought between stable subjects and those in pulmonary exacerbation, and between AWESCORE and CFQ-R. Results: A total of 99 patients were included, 29 of whom were during their acute exacerbation period (29%). All questions showed intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values above 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. Scores were higher during clinical stability compared to pulmonary exacerbation (mean ± SD): 79.35 ± 6.51 versus 41.93 ± 8.58 (P < .001). All questions were significantly worse in the acute exacerbation period, showing excellent validity with P values below .001 for each question. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the AWESCORE is valid and reliable in its ability to evaluate QoL in patients with CF.

Identifiers

PMID40091631
PMCPMC11963329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.