ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2025
The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the AWESCORE Test.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patient-reported quality of life (QoL) measurement is crucial in making clinical decisions in unison with the patients. The current gold standard for cystic fibrosis (CF) is the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised (CFQ-R), which has different applications for different age groups and requires a computer program to be evaluated. There is a need for a straightforward way to evaluate QoL in both pediatric and adult patients with CF. The study aims to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Alfred Wellness Score (AWESCORE) test that has been developed to evaluate QoL in patients with CF. Materials and Methods: This study is a methodological study. The AWESCORE form was translated into Turkish and was applied to patients above 10 years of age. It includes 10 questions. Each question was scored using a numerical rating scale of 0-10. Total scores ranged from 0 to 100. Test-retest reliability was assessed over 24 hours. To determine validity, comparisons were sought between stable subjects and those in pulmonary exacerbation, and between AWESCORE and CFQ-R. Results: A total of 99 patients were included, 29 of whom were during their acute exacerbation period (29%). All questions showed intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values above 0.9, indicating excellent reliability. Scores were higher during clinical stability compared to pulmonary exacerbation (mean ± SD): 79.35 ± 6.51 versus 41.93 ± 8.58 (P < .001). All questions were significantly worse in the acute exacerbation period, showing excellent validity with P values below .001 for each question. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the AWESCORE is valid and reliable in its ability to evaluate QoL in patients with CF.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.