ReviewAnnals of laboratory medicine2025
Application of Metabolic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: A Literature Review.
Review in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A label-free microLC-SWATH-MS methodology with immunoaffinity depletion of highly abundant serum proteins for quantitative proteomic comparison of fresh-frozen human normal breast tissue and tumor clinical specimens.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancers: a metabolic perspective.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Review
- Metabolomic Analysis of Breast Cancer in Colombian Patients: Exploring Molecular Signatures in Different Subtypes and Stages.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Global research trends and emerging themes in osteosarcoma metabolomics: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Article
- Metabolic reprogramming in the post-metastatic tumor microenvironment: multi-omics insights into determinants of immunotherapy response.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Novel biomarkers for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in breast cancer are needed and extensively studied. Metabolites, which are small molecules produced during metabolic processes, provide links between genetics, environment, and phenotype, making them useful biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and disease classification. With recent advancements in metabolomics techniques, metabolomics research has expanded, which has led to significant progress in biomarker research. In breast cancer, alterations in metabolic pathways result in distinct metabolomic profiles that can be harnessed for biomarker discovery. Studies using mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy have helped identify significant changes in metabolites, such as amino acids, lipids, and organic acids, in the tissues, blood, and urine of patients with breast cancer, highlighting their potential as biomarkers. Integrative analysis of these metabolite biomarkers with existing clinical parameters is expected to improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis and to be helpful in predicting prognosis and treatment responses. However, to apply these findings in clinical practice, larger cohorts for validation and standardized analytical methods for QC are necessary. In this review, we provide information on the current state of metabolite biomarker research in breast cancer, highlighting key findings and their clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.