ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2025
Density-dependent feedback across nested levels of organization in a social primate.
Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Linking social attention to reproductive state and future reproduction in female monkeys.Behavioral ecology and sociobiology · 2026Article
- Density-dependent feedback across nested levels of organization in a social primate.The Journal of animal ecology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The strength and direction of density-dependent mechanisms acting on individual reproduction and survival may vary across the nested levels of organization social animals live in, such that complex patterns of density dependence shape fitness and population growth. Yet knowledge of such processes of population regulation where individuals are simultaneously subjected to contrasting density effects remains limited. We quantify and contrast density effects on components of individual fitness across two nested levels of organization: the population and the social group, using 45 years of demographic data of rhesus macaques. Our analysis reveals opposing density feedback on individual reproduction and survival across levels of organization and shows that density does not affect all life stages equally. While increased population density reduced female reproduction during maturation, females in larger groups were more likely to reproduce. Infant survival was optimal at intermediate population densities, and monkeys in larger groups showed increased survival. Our work shows that population-level density effects on individual reproduction and survival can be as strong as group-level effects and suggests different roles of the philopatric (i.e. females) and dispersing (i.e. males) sexes on the regulation of individual demographic performance. In this way, our work posits testable mechanistic hypotheses for evaluating density effects on components of individual fitness and highlights the need to explicitly consider the organization and demographic structure of social animals when quantifying individual performance and population dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.