ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Silicon Carbide Photonic Crystal Photoelectrode.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Silicon Carbide Photonic Crystal Photoelectrode.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The immense challenge of large-scale implementation of photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting and carbon fixation lies in the need for a cheap, durable, and efficacious photocatalyst. Cubic silicon carbide (3C-SiC) holds compelling potential due to its auspicious band positions and high-volume, high-quality, single crystal industrial manufacturing, but is hindered by its inferior light absorptivity and anodic instability. A slanted parabolic pore photonic crystal (spbPore PC) architecture with graphitic carbon nitride (g-CN), nickel(II) oxide (NiO), or 6H silicon carbide protective coatings is proposed to overcome the drawbacks of 3C-SiC photoelectrodes. A 30 µm- and 62 µm-thick 3C-SiC spbPore PC of lattice constant 0.8 µm demonstrates maximum achievable photocurrent density (MAPD) of 9.95 and 11.53 mA cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.