Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091499›Full record

ArticleACS chemical neuroscience2025

Exploring Human Brain Metabolism via Genome-Scale Metabolic Modeling with Highlights on Multiple Sclerosis.

Mustafa Sertbas, Kutlu O Ulgen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS chemical neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mustafa SertbasDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Bogazici University, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0278-9397
Kutlu O UlgenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Bogazici University, 34342 Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3668-3467

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral dysfunctions give rise to a wide range of neurological diseases due to the structural and functional complexity of the human brain stemming from the interactive cellular metabolism of its specific cells, including neurons and glial cells. In parallel with advances in isolation and measurement technologies, genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) have become a powerful tool in the studies of systems biology to provide critical insights into the understanding of sophisticated eukaryotic systems. In this study, brain cell-specific GEMs were reconstructed for neurons, astrocytes, microglia, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursor cells by integrating single-cell RNA-seq data and global Human1 via a task-driven integrative network inference for tissues (tINIT) algorithm. Then, intercellular reactions among neurons, astrocytes, microglia, and oligodendrocytes were added to generate a combined brain model, iHumanBrain2690. This brain network was used in the prediction of metabolic alterations in glucose, ketone bodies, oxygen change, and reporter metabolites. Glucose supplementation increased the subsystems' activities in glycolysis, and ketone bodies elevated those in the TCA cycle and oxidative phosphorylation. Reporter metabolite analysis identified L-carnitine and arachidonate as the top reporter metabolites in gray and white matter microglia in multiple sclerosis (MS), respectively. Carbamoyl-phosphate was found to be the top reporter metabolite in primary progressive MS. Taken together, single and integrated iHumanBrain2690 metabolic networks help us elucidate complex metabolism in brain physiology and homeostasis in health and disease.

Indexed as

BrainMultiple SclerosisAstrocytesHumansMicrogliaNeuronsOligodendrogliabrain metabolismflux balance analysisgenome-scale metabolic modelingmultiple sclerosisreporter metabolites

Identifiers

PMID40091499
PMCPMC11969529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.