ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2025
Recognition, management, and patient perspectives of impulsive-compulsive disorders in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of Dopaminergic Medication on Impulse Control and Compulsive Behaviour: A Translational Perspective.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundImpulsive-compulsive disorders (ICDs) are commonly acknowledged as side effects of dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). While many large-scale studies have focused on prevalences and high-risk treatments, little is known about practical management of ICDs in clinical care and patients' experiences.ObjectiveTo investigate how ICDs are recognized in clinical PD care, clinical features of patients with ICDs, and how patients are impacted by their ICD.MethodsQuestionnaires were sent to all patients who reported ICD symptoms in the Swedish quality register for PD in Skåne County (n = 170) and patients' medical records were screened for mention of ICDs. Core subjects were communication between clinician and patient, course and management of ICDs, and impact on different life domains.ResultsDespite sufficient awareness of the ICD risk during PD treatment, there was limited communication between clinical care staff and patients regarding ICDs. Only 49% of patients had reported their ICD as part of clinical care, and only 14% had been asked about it. Additionally, collaboration with psychiatry was rare (12%). ICD severity increased over time with ongoing PD treatment, and most patients reported a mild to moderate impact of their ICD on close relationships, family, mental and physical health.ConclusionsThis study identified insufficient communication about ICDs as part of clinical care in PD and a very limited involvement of mental health services. Thus, to improve prevention and treatment, ICDs should be recognized, monitored and treated more systematically in routine clinical care, and collaboration with mental health services should be increased.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.