ArticleJournal of Parkinson's disease2025
Freezing of gait detection: The effect of sensor type, position, activities, datasets, and machine learning model.
Article in Journal of Parkinson's disease, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Usefulness of Wearable Sensors for Detecting Freezing of Gait in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Pooled it
- Deep learning for freezing of gait assessment using inertial measurement units: a multicentre validation study.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Beyond the Leaderboard: Evaluating the Robustness of Deep Learning Models for Detecting Freezing of Gait.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- A multi-level annotated sensor dataset of gait freezing manifestations and severity in Parkinson's disease.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Excessive daytime sleepiness and gait disturbances in patients with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundFreezing of gait (FoG) is a complex, frequent, and disabling motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD). Wearable technology has the potential to improve FoG assessment by providing objective, quantitative, and continuous monitoring.ObjectiveThis study aims to develop a robust FoG detection algorithm that can be embedded in a simple and unobtrusive wearable sensor system and can lead to a reliable unsupervised home assessment.MethodsTwenty-two subjects with PD and FoG were enrolled, equipped with four inertial modules on the ankles, back, and wrist, and asked to perform different tasks. Feature-driven and data-driven machine learning approaches were implemented, optimized, and evaluated. Further testing was conducted on two external datasets including a total of 545 FoG episodes.ResultsSixteen subjects experienced FoG, providing a total number of 101 FoG events. Results demonstrated that a single sensor on the ankle, with an adequate algorithm of data analysis based on machine learning, can provide a non-invasive approach for accurate FoG detection. The model proved robust on the independent datasets, with 88-95% FoG episodes correctly detected. Interestingly, while FoG can be easily discriminated from walking, static positions, and postural transitions, turning represents a significant challenge. The high number of false alarms still represents the main limitation of the FoG recognition algorithms.ConclusionsThe collected dataset includes data from different sensors at different body positions. This, together with detailed labeling of tasks, activities, FoG episodes and their severity, can be a significant contribution to research on automatic FoG detection and characterization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.