Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091354›Full record

ReviewInnate immunity

Anti-Rheumatic potential of biological DMARDS and protagonistic role of bio-markers in early detection and management of rheumatoid arthritis.

Muhammad Riaz, Ghulam Rasool, Ruhamah Yousaf, Hina Fatima, Naveed Munir, Hasan Ejaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Innate immunity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Cellular senescence and aging: molecular mechanisms and convergent pathways.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Platelet-rich Plasma: ACurrent drug research reviews · 2026
    Review
  6. Antibiotics for Rheumatologic Diseases: A Critical Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Muhammad RiazDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-7735
Ghulam RasoolDepartment of Allied Health Sciences, University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan.
Ruhamah YousafDepartment of Health Professional Technologies, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hina FatimaDepartment of Biochemistry, Government College Women University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Naveed MunirDepartment of Biomedical Lab Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Hasan EjazDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that primarily affects the synovial joint linings, resulting in progressive disability, increased mortality, and considerable economic costs. Early treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic medications (DMARDs) can significantly improve the overall outlook for people with RA. Contemporary pharmaceutical interventions, encompassing standard, biological, and emerging small molecule disease- modifying anti-rheumatic medications continue to be the cornerstone of RA management, with substantial advancements made in the pursuit of achieving remission from the disease and preventing joint deformities. Nevertheless, a substantial segment of individuals with RA do not experience a satisfactory response to existing treatments, underscoring the pressing need for novel therapeutic options. Biologic DMARDs are among the therapy choices. Non-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (Non-TNFi) such as abatacept, rituximab, tocilizumab, and sarilumab are examples, as are anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) medications such as infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, and certolizumab pegol. More recent biomarkers have emerged and showed usefulness in the early detection of RA. These biomarkers, often referred to simply as "biomarkers", are quantifiable indicators of normal or pathologic processes, and they can also gauge treatment response. The assessment of RA treatment response typically combines patient-reported outcomes, physical evaluations, and laboratory findings, as there isn't a single biomarker that has proven sufficient for measuring disease activity. This review explores the usage of biologic DMARDs as a therapeutic approach for RA, as well as the biomarkers typically used for RA early diagnosis, prognosis prediction, and disease activity evaluation.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiological ProductsAnimalsBiomarkersEarly DiagnosisHumansTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsBiomarkersTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAutoimmune disorderbDMARDsbiomarkersdisease-modifying antirheumatic drugsmanagementrheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID40091354
PMCPMC11912179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.