Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091343›Full record

ArticleSmall (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)2026

System Design Considerations for Magneto-Electrocatalysis of the Oxygen Evolution Reaction.

Dorottya Szalay, Amy Radford, Yiyang Li, Shik Chi Edman Tsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dorottya SzalayWolfson Catalysis Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK.
Amy RadfordWolfson Catalysis Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK.
Yiyang LiWolfson Catalysis Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9278-7386
Shik Chi Edman TsangWolfson Catalysis Centre, Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QR, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/S023828/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of an external magnetic field into electrocatalysis, termed magneto-electrocatalysis, can target efficiency challenges in the oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Reaction rates can be enhanced through improved mass transport of reactants and products, manipulation of spin states, and lowered resistance. The OER is a kinetic bottleneck in electrocatalytic water splitting for sustainable hydrogen fuel. Previous studies lack comprehensive analyses and consistent reporting of magnetic field effects, resulting in varied interpretations. To establish optimized and reliable systems at larger scales, significant research advancements are required. This perspective explores the complex impact of magnetic fields on OER, emphasizing the interplay between various mechanisms such as spin-polarization of oxygen intermediates, Lorentz force-induced magnetohydrodynamics, and magnetoresistance. Here, how experimental design - such as electrode magnetism, shape, positioning, and reactor setup - can significantly influence these mechanisms is highlighted. Through a comprehensive review of current studies, major knowledge gaps and propose methodologies are identified to improve experimental reproducibility and comparability. This article aims to guide researchers toward the development of more efficient, scalable systems that leverage magnetic fields to enhance water splitting to push forward commercial green hydrogen production.

Indexed as

lorentz forcemagnetohydrodynamicsmagnetoresistancespin‐pinningwater‐splitting

Identifiers

PMID40091343
PMCPMC12934372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.