Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091193›Full record

SynthesisBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Graph neural networks for single-cell omics data: a review of approaches and applications.

Sijie Li, Heyang Hua, Shengquan Chen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Distinguishing causal from tagging enhancers using single-cell multiome data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sijie LiSchool of Mathematical Sciences and The Key Laboratory of Pure Mathematics and Combinatorics, Ministry of Education (LPMC), Nankai University, No. 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0009-0005-0521-0722
Heyang HuaSchool of Mathematical Sciences and The Key Laboratory of Pure Mathematics and Combinatorics, Ministry of Education (LPMC), Nankai University, No. 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0009-0006-7754-7006
Shengquan ChenSchool of Mathematical Sciences and The Key Laboratory of Pure Mathematics and Combinatorics, Ministry of Education (LPMC), Nankai University, No. 94 Weijin Road, Nankai District, Tianjin 300071, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3503-9306

Funding

CAST 2023QNRC001National Natural Science Foundation of China 62473212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid advancement of sequencing technologies now allows for the utilization of precise signals at single-cell resolution in various omics studies. However, the massive volume, ultra-high dimensionality, and high sparsity nature of single-cell data have introduced substantial difficulties to traditional computational methods. The intricate non-Euclidean networks of intracellular and intercellular signaling molecules within single-cell datasets, coupled with the complex, multimodal structures arising from multi-omics joint analysis, pose significant challenges to conventional deep learning operations reliant on Euclidean geometries. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have extended deep learning to non-Euclidean data, allowing cells and their features in single-cell datasets to be modeled as nodes within a graph structure. GNNs have been successfully applied across a broad range of tasks in single-cell data analysis. In this survey, we systematically review 107 successful applications of GNNs and their six variants in various single-cell omics tasks. We begin by outlining the fundamental principles of GNNs and their six variants, followed by a systematic review of GNN-based models applied in single-cell epigenomics, transcriptomics, spatial transcriptomics, proteomics, and multi-omics. In each section dedicated to a specific omics type, we have summarized the publicly available single-cell datasets commonly utilized in the articles reviewed in that section, totaling 77 datasets. Finally, we summarize the potential shortcomings of current research and explore directions for future studies. We anticipate that this review will serve as a guiding resource for researchers to deepen the application of GNNs in single-cell omics.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenomicsGraph Neural NetworksSingle-Cell AnalysisDeep LearningEpigenomicsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerProteomicsepigenomicsgraph neutral networksproteomicssingle-celltranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40091193
PMCPMC11911123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.