ArticleScientific reports2025
Mitigating opinion polarization in social networks using adversarial attacks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Steering polarization toward consensus in signed majority-vote opinion models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the spread of social networking services (SNS) has made it easier to connect with people who have similar opinions. Accordingly, similar opinions are shared within a group, while the frequency of exposure to different opinions tends to decrease. As a result, the polarization of opinion among groups is more likely to occur. Some studies have been conducted to identify the conditions under which opinion polarization occurs by simulating opinion dynamics, but specific methods for mitigating it have been poorly understood. Recently, it was found that even a few artificial perturbations inspired by the adversarial attack reverse the result in voter models, where a minority opinion becomes dominant through these perturbations. In this study, we conducted numerical simulations to determine whether it is possible to mitigate opinion polarization by adding such perturbations to the network in opinion dynamics models. The results show that opinion polarization can be mitigated by strategically generating perturbations to the weights of network links, and the effect increases as the perturbation strength parameter increases. Moreover, our analysis reveals that the effectiveness of this polarization mitigating method is enhanced in larger networks. Our results propose an effective way to prevent polarization of opinion in social networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.