Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091140›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Mitigating opinion polarization in social networks using adversarial attacks.

Michinori Ninomiya, Genki Ichinose, Katsumi Chiyomaru, Kazuhiro Takemoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michinori NinomiyaDepartment of Mathematical and Systems Engineering, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, 432-8561, Japan.
Genki IchinoseDepartment of Mathematical and Systems Engineering, Shizuoka University, Hamamatsu, 432-8561, Japan. ichinose.genki@shizuoka.ac.jp.
Katsumi ChiyomaruDepartment of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-8502, Japan.
Kazuhiro TakemotoDepartment of Bioscience and Bioinformatics, Kyushu Institute of Technology, Iizuka, Fukuoka, 820-8502, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the spread of social networking services (SNS) has made it easier to connect with people who have similar opinions. Accordingly, similar opinions are shared within a group, while the frequency of exposure to different opinions tends to decrease. As a result, the polarization of opinion among groups is more likely to occur. Some studies have been conducted to identify the conditions under which opinion polarization occurs by simulating opinion dynamics, but specific methods for mitigating it have been poorly understood. Recently, it was found that even a few artificial perturbations inspired by the adversarial attack reverse the result in voter models, where a minority opinion becomes dominant through these perturbations. In this study, we conducted numerical simulations to determine whether it is possible to mitigate opinion polarization by adding such perturbations to the network in opinion dynamics models. The results show that opinion polarization can be mitigated by strategically generating perturbations to the weights of network links, and the effect increases as the perturbation strength parameter increases. Moreover, our analysis reveals that the effectiveness of this polarization mitigating method is enhanced in larger networks. Our results propose an effective way to prevent polarization of opinion in social networks.

Indexed as

Social NetworkingAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID40091140
PMCPMC11911447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.