ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Anatomical features and clinical significance of the ascending pharyngeal artery in carotid endarterectomy.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Origin Variants of the Ascending Pharyngeal Artery and Sequential External Carotid Branching Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the anatomical characteristics of the ascending pharyngeal artery (APhA) using three-dimensional rotational angiography (3D-RA) and its role in preventing complications during carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Data from 279 primary CEAs (259 patients; median age, 73 years; male/female ratio, 6.2:1) conducted between 2006 and 2022 at a single center were retrospectively analyzed. The APhA anatomy was evaluated using carotid 3D-RA. The APhA was identified on 3D-RA in 277 of 279 carotid arteries (99.3%), with 98.6% showing a single APhA and 1.4% duplication. Among single APhAs, 60.1% arose from the external carotid artery (ECA), 34.8% from the occipital artery, 3.3% from the internal carotid artery, and 1.5% from the carotid bifurcation. Of the 170 APhAs directly arising from the ECA, 64.1% originated from the medial wall and 35.9% from the posterior wall. A higher carotid bifurcation level significantly correlated with a shorter distance between the APhA origin and carotid bifurcation (Spearman's rho = - 0.583; p < 0.001). During CEA, APhA manipulation with cross-clamping was required in 15.8% (44/279) of cases, and no unexpected back-bleeding occurred. The incidence of cranial nerve injury (CNI) was 1.4% (4/279), with a trend toward higher risk when the APhA was manipulated (odds ratio, 5.70; p = 0.086). The APhA typically originates medially or posteriorly from the carotid artery. In standard antero-lateral CEA approaches, this places the APhA on the obscured backside of the artery, emphasizing the importance of preoperative identification and intraoperative management to prevent back-bleeding and CNI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40091128What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.