Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40091111›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

Best practices for in-situ and operando techniques within electrocatalytic systems.

Aditya Prajapati, Christopher Hahn, Inez M Weidinger, Yanmei Shi, Yonghyuk Lee, Anastassia N Alexandrova, David Thompson, Simon R Bare, Shuai Chen, Shuai Yan and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ACS omega · 2026
    Review
  2. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Design of High-Entropy Oxide Catalysts.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Scanning Photoelectrochemical (Cell) Microscopy forChemical & biomedical imaging · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Interfacial Control in Cu-MXene Hybrids Enables Selective NOx-to-NHAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. When Light Drives Discovery: Plasmonics at the Frontier of Energy Materials.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aditya PrajapatiMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA.
Christopher HahnMaterials Science Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA. hahn31@llnl.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2772-6341
Inez M WeidingerFaculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technische Universität Dresden, 01062, Dresden, Germany. inez.weidinger@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9316-6349
Yanmei ShiInstitute of Molecular Plus, Tianjin University, 300072, Tianjin, China. yanmeishi@tju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-4342
Yonghyuk LeeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.
Anastassia N AlexandrovaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA. ana@chem.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3003-1911
David ThompsonStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Simon R BareStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. srbare@slac.stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-0342
Shuai ChenInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Str. 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6964-3755
Shuai YanInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Str. 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany.
Nikolay KornienkoInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, University of Bonn, Gerhard-Domagk-Str. 1, 53121, Bonn, Germany. nkornien@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7193-2428

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) KO 7060/4-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In-situ and operando techniques in heterogeneous electrocatalysis are a powerful tool used to elucidate reaction mechanisms. Ultimately, they are key in determining concrete links between a catalyst's physical/electronic structure and its activity en route to designing next-generation systems. To this end, the exact execution and interpretation of these lines of experiments is critical as this determines the strength of conclusions that can be drawn and what uncertainties remain. Instead of focusing on how techniques were used to understand systems, as is the case with most reviews on the topic, this work instead initiates a nuanced discussion of 1) how to best carry out each technique and 2) initiate a nuanced analysis of which level of insights can be drawn from the set of in-situ or operando experiments/controls carried out. We focus on several commonly used techniques, including vibrational (IR, Raman) spectroscopy, X-ray absorption spectroscopy and electrochemical mass spectrometry. In addition to this, we include sections of reactor design and the link with theoretical modelling that are applicable across all techniques. While we focus on heterogeneous electrocatalysis, we make links when appropriate to the areas of photo- and thermo-catalytic systems. We highlight common pitfalls in the field, how to avoid them, and what sets of complementary experiments may be used to strengthen the analysis. We end with an overview of what gaps remain in in-situ and operando techniques and what innovations must be made to overcome them.

Identifiers

PMID40091111
PMCPMC11911412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.