ArticleScientific reports2025
The development and validation of a performance infill tracking system to investigate rotational traction mechanisms on artificial turf surfaces.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scientific principles governing the generation of rotational traction forces on artificial turf remain poorly understood; as such, a photogrammetry technique has been developed to understand the interactions occurring at the boot-surface interface. Videos were recorded through a transparent test foot during rotational traction testing on an artificial turf surface "seeded" with distinguishable performance infill particles. A novel particle tracking software then measured the movement of seeded particles. To determine the uncertainty in the methodology, a gold-standard measurement system determined the distances between 28 fiducial markers. The same marker-to-marker distances were measured using the particle tracking software. For ten static and ten rotating trials, the random bias in the particle tracking software distances was ± 0.89 mm to ± 1.07 mm, respectively. A pilot study on a third-generation artificial turf surface assessed the software's ability to track infill particles during rotational traction testing. Trials were conducted at two normal loads; particle positions and angular displacements were successfully measured over 40° of rotation and synchronised with torque, angle, and vertical displacement data. A greater number of infill particles were lost during tracking at lower normal loads. This novel methodology represents a useful development in understanding the generation of traction forces, helping to inform future generations of artificial turf and studded footwear.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.