ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
Does the charitable medical assistance program impact catastrophic medical expenditures for families of children with leukemia? An evidence-based study in China.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of a minor child's cancer diagnosis on parental work: a scoping review.Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPediatric leukemia is the most prevalent childhood cancer in China, exerting a considerable financial impact on affected families. Despite the mandatory participation of all Chinese children in the Resident Basic Medical Insurance, out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses remain substantial for families of children with leukemia. However, charity assistance has been shown to help mitigate these financial burdens. The "Love Union Project" is a comprehensive charitable medical assistance program designed to support families of children with leukemia within China's multi-tiered healthcare security system. This study was designed to evaluate the impact of the "Love Union Project" on reducing the incidence of catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) among families of children with leukemia in China.
methodsThe study involved 85 children in the intervention group from H city and 36 matched control children from S and Y cities. Data on demographics, medical expenses, and assistance were collected. Non-normally distributed costs were reported as medians. Multivariate logistic regression analyzed the impact of the "Love Union Project" on CHE.
resultsThanks to the program's intervention, the CHE rate among the intervention group decreased from 75.3% to 65.9%, while the incidence of CHE in the control group was 75.0%. Compared to families with children aged 0-6 years, those aged 7-12 were more likely to incur CHE (OR 5.224; 95% confidence intervals 1.412-19.322). Families with five or more members were also at higher risk of CHE than those with four members or fewer (OR 2.847; 95% confidence intervals 1.056-7.676). Additionally, families with a monthly income of CNY8000($1,120) or more were less likely to experience CHE than those with a monthly income of CNY4000($560) or less (OR 0.257; 95% confidence intervals 0.072-0.923). Lastly, families receiving assistance from the "Love Union Project" reported significantly lower CHE rates than those who didn't receive such support (OR 0.151; 95% confidence intervals 0.044-0.524).
conclusionWhile medical insurance provides limited relief, the "Love Union Project" enhances economic resilience for families of children with leukemia. Attention should focus on younger patients, larger households, lower-income families, and those not receiving charity support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.