ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
The impact of perioperative aspirin utilization on postoperative hemorrhagic complications in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a single-center retrospective analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesIdiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) primarily affects older patients. Ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt surgery is a standard treatment. Many iNPH patients have high cardiovascular risks and require aspirin (ASA) therapy to prevent thromboembolic events. Discontinuing ASA increases the risk of these events. This study evaluates the impact of perioperative ASA use on hemorrhagic complications in iNPH patients undergoing VP shunt surgery.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent VP shunt surgery for iNPH from January 2020 to September 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on perioperative ASA use: no ASA (n = 50) and ASA continued (n = 51). Data collected included demographics, surgery details, ASA dosage, and indications for ASA use. Primary outcomes were early and late postoperative hemorrhage incidences. Postoperative follow-up included MRI or CT scans at regular intervals (mean ≈ one year). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 23.0, with Chi-square tests and independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests used to analyze differences between groups.
resultsThe study cohort had 101 patients with a mean age of 69.5 ± 7.6 years, 41.6% female and 58.4% male. Early postoperative hemorrhage occurred in 5% of patients, including epidural (1), intraparenchymal(3), and intraventricular hematoma(1). Late postoperative hemorrhages occurred in 4% of patients ( 4 patients in the no-ASA group), with two cases each of unilateral and bilateral subdural hematoma. No significant differences in hemorrhagic outcomes were observed between the ASA continuation and non-use groups (p = 0.092). The mean follow-up period was 300 days. One patient died in non-ASA group due to neurodegenerative disease.
conclusionPerioperative ASA use does not significantly impact the incidence of postoperative hemorrhages in iNPH patients undergoing VP shunt surgery. These findings suggest that ASA can be safely continued without increasing hemorrhagic risks. This is a particularly significant issue for patients with high cardiovascular risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.