ArticleExperimental brain research2025
The neural correlates of target and hand vision during movement planning and execution.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the current study, electroencephalographic (EEG) data was recorded to study the impact of hand and target visibility on neural processing during both the planning and execution of upper limb reaches. Prior to each movement, participants were informed if the hand and/or the target would be available in four conditions: (1) hand and target visible, (2) hand only, (3) target only, and (4) no hand, no target. Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were assessed after target onset (i.e., prior to the reaching movement: P2), which revealed larger positive components when vision of the target was not going to be available during the reaching movement (i.e., hand only, no hand-no target) compared to when the target would be present (i.e., hand and target, target only). Further, the motor-related evoked potentials (MEPs) observed in relation to the reaching movement onset showed that a second negative peak generated during the execution of the reaching movement was significantly greater for reaches without vision of the hand, as compared to reaches with vision of the hand. Our results indicate a sequential importance of seeing the target and the hand, prior-to and during the movement, respectively. This work provides neurophysiological evidence to better understand the utilization of vision of the hand and target during goal-directed reaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40090992What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.