ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2025
Evaluating the Need for Additional Surgery After Non-Curative Endoscopic Resection in Patients with Remnant Gastric Cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCompletion total gastrectomy is considered an additional treatment after non-curative endoscopic resection for remnant gastric cancer. However, its high invasiveness remains a concern. This study aimed to assess the necessity of additional surgery after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with remnant gastric cancer.
methodsThis study included patients who underwent non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancer between September 2002 and January 2018. The eCura system was used to stratify the risk of lymph node metastasis into low, intermediate, or high. The overall survival, disease-specific survival, and long-term clinical course were analyzed.
resultsAmong the 46 patients analyzed, 15 underwent additional completion total gastrectomy, whereas 31 were only followed up. Within a median follow-up period of 62.5 months, the additional surgery and follow-up groups showed 5-year overall survival rates of 79.4% and 76.8% (P = 0.93) and disease-specific survival rates of 92.9% and 92.7% (P = 0.98). A total of 19 low-, 8 intermediate-, and 4 high-risk patients in the follow-up group achieved 5-year disease-specific survival rates of 100%, 100%, and 33.3%. Significant differences were observed in the disease-specific survival between the low- and high-risk patients (P < 0.001) and between the intermediate- and high-risk patients (P = 0.02).
conclusionRisk stratification using the eCura system allows for individualized treatment decisions, with follow-up being a viable option for low- and intermediate-risk patients and additional surgery recommended for high-risk patients after non-curative endoscopic submucosal dissection for remnant gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40090990What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.