Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40090957›Full record

ArticleNeurosurgical review2025

Customized 3D-printed Poly ether ether ketone cranial implant for cranioplasty of skull defects.

Farid Qoorchi Moheb Seraj, Daniel Kheradmand, Sajjad Najafi, Masoumeh Jahed Taghi Dizaj, Sanaz Salmasian, Arash Ghasemi, Reza Ghasemi, Samira Zabihyan, Hamid Etemadrezaie, Feizollah Ebrahimnia and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Farid Qoorchi Moheb SerajNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Daniel KheradmandNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sajjad NajafiNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Masoumeh Jahed Taghi DizajNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Sanaz SalmasianNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Arash GhasemiNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Reza GhasemiNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Samira ZabihyanNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Hamid EtemadrezaieNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Feizollah EbrahimniaNeurosurgery Department, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ashkan MowlaNeurosurgery Department, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Humain BaharvahdatNeurosurgery Department, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. humainbv@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cranioplasty become one of the common surgeries in the neurosurgical field. The complex configuration of the cranium makes the bone reconstruction of the skull defects a challenging procedure. While the patient's own bone flap is the best option, other materials such as titanium and Poly ether ether Ketone (PEEK) were used for cranioplasty when the autogenous flap of the patient is unavailable. Recently, customized 3D printing implants were developed for cranioplasty with favorable outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of customized 3-dimentional (3D)-printed PEEK implant cranioplasty for reconstructing skull defects, especially large ones. We report a series of 27 patients whose skull defects were reconstructed by a customized 3D-printed PEEK implants. Demographic data and postoperative clinical and imaging findings were reviewed. We analyzed the complications, clinical and aesthetic outcomes during mid-term follow-up. During the surgery, all the implants were perfectly fitted in the skull defect without any major modification. Aesthetic results were satisfactory in 74.1% of patients. 4 patients (14.8%) had complications, including 3 deep cranial infections (11.1%) and one extradural hematoma (3,7%). In 2 patients (7.4%), the implants were removed due to infection. Therefore, when autologous bone is unavailable or, in selected cases with large or complex skull defects, customized 3D-printed PEEK implants could be a proper option to reconstruct these defects.

Indexed as

KetonesPlastic Surgery ProceduresPolyethylene GlycolsPrinting, Three-DimensionalProstheses and ImplantsSkullAdolescentAdultAgedBenzophenonesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolymersTreatment OutcomeBenzophenonesKetonespolyetheretherketonePolyethylene GlycolsPolymers3D-printingCranioplastyImplantReconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.