Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40090881›Full record

ArticlePsychophysiology2025

The Interplay of Spontaneous Pupil-Size Fluctuations and EEG Power in Near-Threshold Detection.

Veera Ruuskanen, C Nico Boehler, Sebastiaan Mathôt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Veera RuuskanenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9959-5117
C Nico BoehlerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.
Sebastiaan MathôtDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Grant VI.Vidi.191.045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of near-threshold stimuli depends on the properties of the stimulus and the state of the observer. In visual detection tasks, improved accuracy is associated with larger prestimulus pupil size. However, it is still unclear whether this association is due to optical effects (more light entering the eye), correlations with arousal, correlations with cortical excitability (as reflected in alpha power), or a mix of these. To better understand this, we investigated the relative contributions of pupil size and power in the alpha, beta, and theta frequency bands on near-threshold detection. We found that larger prestimulus pupil size is associated with improved accuracy and more stimulus-present responses, and these effects were not mediated by spectral power in the EEG. Pupil size was also positively correlated with power in the beta and alpha bands. Taken together, our results show an independent effect of pupil size on detection performance that is not driven by cortical excitability but may be driven by optical effects, physiological arousal, or a mix of both.

Indexed as

BrainPupilVisual PerceptionAdultArousalElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultarousalEEGnear‐threshold detectionpupil sizevisual perception

Identifiers

PMID40090881
PMCPMC11911296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.