Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40090856›Full record

ReviewAnatomical sciences education2025

The art and craft of anatomy.

Janet Philp, Joan Smith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The art and craft of anatomy.Anatomical sciences education · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Anatomy engagement and science communication.Anatomical sciences education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Janet PhilpUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-7548
Joan SmithIndependent Artist, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6253-2801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding human anatomy is crucial for improving public health outcomes; however, effective methods of engaging the public in this domain remain underexplored. This report investigates four hands-on, creative, and accessible methods for enhancing anatomical knowledge during public engagement events: drawing, clay modeling, needle felting, and baking. Drawing on the principles of the Portal to Public Framework and adult learning theory, we explore how each method offers ethical and inexpensive opportunities for interactive learning, devoid of complex health, and safety and ethical concerns. Through 15 years of implementing these activities in public workshops, we demonstrate how the act of creating tangible representations of anatomical parts not only facilitates deeper understanding but also allows participants to embody the learned concepts unconsciously, aiding retention and engagement. Our findings suggest that these kinesthetic and haptic learning experiences significantly enhance the public's anatomical knowledge and engagement, offering vital insights into effective educational practices outside of formal settings. This article discusses the theoretical underpinnings and practical applications of these methods, highlighting their potential to transform public health education by making learning both accessible and impactful.

Indexed as

AnatomyAdultHumansLearninganatomyartart‐based engagementcreative approachpublic engagement

Identifiers

PMID40090856
PMCPMC12702829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.