Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40090855›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

The importance of science communication and public engagement to professional associations.

Martine Dunnwald, Valerie B DeLeon, Anne M Burrows

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Anatomy engagement and science communication.Anatomical sciences education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martine DunnwaldDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-8874
Valerie B DeLeonDepartment of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5004-5977
Anne M BurrowsDepartment of Physical Therapy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific associations exist to serve their members and advance their science. They also provide a platform for scientists to communicate their science and engage with the public, such as hosting free resources on their web pages and organizing outreach activities with local communities. Historically, scientific associations were often internally focused. Despite the common stereotype of exclusive clubs of gentleman naturalists, there are numerous examples since the 17th century of scientific associations encouraging public engagement. This became increasingly common, and throughout the last several decades, scientific associations like the American Association for Anatomy (AAA) have been working to make changes in how science, scientists, and the public work together to produce the best scientific outcomes. This viewpoint defines different levels of relationships between the scientist and the public and how they affect outcomes related to the public's trust in science and scientists. It then provides a historical perspective on how associations have contributed to the communication of science. Lastly, it discusses the role of associations in science communication and public engagement and whether it is important for associations and why. It concludes with examples of the strategic programs of AAA that demonstrate how scientific associations can support public engagement, resulting in benefits to the public, scientists, and the anatomical sciences.

Indexed as

CommunicationCommunity ParticipationScienceSocieties, ScientificAnatomyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHumansassociationengagementpublicscience communication

Identifiers

PMID40090855
PMCPMC12702833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.