ArticleBMJ global health2025
Longitudinal study on quality of life following cervical cancer treatment in Botswana.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adherence to Survivorship Care Visits in Patients With Cervical Cancer in Botswana.JCO global oncology · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study longitudinally assessed the quality of life (QoL) in patients who completed chemoradiation (CRT) for cervical cancer in Botswana and compared the QoL for those living with and without HIV infection.
methodsPatients with cervical cancer recommended for curative CRT were enrolled from August 2016 to February 2020. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life (QLQ-C30) and cervical cancer-specific (QLQ-Cx24) questionnaires, translated into Setswana, were used to assess the QoL of patients prior to treatment (baseline), at the end of treatment (EOT) and in 3 month intervals post-treatment for 2 years, and statistical analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 294 women (median age: 46 years) were enrolled and followed up for an average of 16.4 months. Of women with recorded staging, most had FIGO stage III/IV disease (64.4%). Women living with HIV (WLWH; 74.1%) presented at earlier ages than those without HIV (44.8 years vs 54.7 years, p<0.001). The QoL for all domains did not differ by HIV status at baseline, EOT or 24 month follow-up. Per QLQ-C30, the mean global health status score (72.21 vs 78.37; p<0.01) and the symptom (12.70 vs 7.63; p=0.04) and functional scales (88.34 vs 91.85; p<0.01) improved significantly from the EOT to the 24 month follow-up for all patients; however, using the QLQ-Cx24 survey, no significant differences in the symptom burden (12.53 vs 13.67; p=0.6) or functional status (91.23 vs 89.90; p=0.53) were found between these two time points.
conclusionThe QoL increased significantly for all patients undergoing CRT, underscoring the value of pursuing curative CRT, regardless of the HIV status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.