ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025
Venous gas emboli (VGE) in 2-D echocardiographic images following movement: grading and association with cumulative incidence of decompression sickness.
Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Venous gas emboli (VGE) are a common surrogate experimental endpoint for decompression sickness (DCS). VGE numbers are graded, and the peak post-dive grade is associated with the probability of DCS (PDCS). VGE are typically graded with the subject at rest when bubble numbers are stable, and again after limb flexions which elicit a transient shower of bubbles. Detection of VGE using two-dimensional (2-D) echocardiography has become common, but the principal grading scales do not specify how to grade VGE after limb movement. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of 1,196 man-dives following which VGE were detected using 2-D echocardiography and graded on a scale 0-4 and 41 cases of DCS occurred. PDCS was estimated for each peak post-dive VGE grade from the cumulative incidence of DCS. Two different definitions of movement VGE grades were assessed in 84 measurements; the grade was either the maximum VGE number sustained for one diastole (1-cycle) or for six cardiac cycles (6-cycle). Results: For each peak post-dive VGE grade (maximum of rest or movement) the cumulative incidences of DCS (%) were: grade 0 (0%); grade 1 (1.3%); grade 2 (2.5%); grade 3 (4.6%); grade 4 (5.7%). When grading movement VGE, 57% of 1-cycle grade 4 were reduced to grade 3 using the 6-cycle definition. Conclusions: There is a need for consensus in the research community on how to assign movement VGE grades when using 2-D echocardiography. Publications should carefully explain methodology for assigning VGE grades and consider differences in methodologies when comparing historical data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.