Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40090023›Full record

ArticleDiving and hyperbaric medicine2025

The influence of wetsuit thickness (≥ 7 mm) on lung volumes in scuba divers.

Graham Stevens, David R Smart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diving and hyperbaric medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Graham StevensDepartment of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
David R SmartPrivate Consultant. Formerly: Clinical Professor, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania and Department of Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: We hypothesised that although thicker (≥ 7 mm) wetsuits delay hypothermia and allow divers to dive in cooler waters, they may hinder pulmonary function. The aim of this study was to investigate whether thicker wetsuits worn by Tasmanian divers affected lung volumes, primarily the forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume, one second (FEV1). Methods: Sixty-two volunteer active divers were recruited from recreational dive clubs and Tasmania's occupational diving industry. After confirming fitness and that the divers were currently active, spirometry testing was performed with and without the divers' usual wet suits, in a controlled dry environment. Suits were of varying thickness, but all were ≥ 7 mm thickness. Results: All divers had significantly reduced lung volumes when wearing ≥ 7 mm wetsuits. Recreational divers had greater decrements (-7% FVC and -5% FEV1), compared to occupational divers (-3% FVC, -3% FEV1). Males' lung volumes declined -4% FVC and -4 % FEV1, whereas females declined -7 % FVC and -6 % FEV1. Female recreational divers experienced the greatest negative impact from thicker wetsuits (up to 15% reduction in FVC), and this group also demonstrated an inverse relationship between increasing wetsuit thickness and declining lung volumes. Conclusions: Wearing thicker wet suits aids in thermal protection in temperate water diving but this study suggests it has negative effects on lung volumes. The real-life impact of this negative effect may be minor in fit healthy divers but might add additional risk to a less fit, recreational diving population with medical comorbidities.

Indexed as

DivingLungAdultFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsSpirometryTasmaniaVital CapacityYoung AdultDiving researchEquipmentFitness to diveLungRespiratorySpirometry

Identifiers

PMID40090023
PMCPMC12263280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.