ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Shared and Unique Neural Codes for Biological Motion Perception in Humans and Macaque Monkeys.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered Hierarchical Visual Rhythm Tracking in Early Deafness.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Shared and Unique Neural Codes for Biological Motion Perception in Humans and Macaque Monkeys.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Understanding biological motion through the lens of animate motion processing.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Throughout evolution, living organisms have honed the ability to swiftly recognize biological motion (BM) across species. However, how the brain processes within- and cross-species BM, and the evolutionary progression of these processes, remain unclear. To investigate these questions, the current study examined brain activity in the lateral temporal areas of humans and monkeys as they passively observed upright and inverted human and macaque BM stimuli. In humans, the middle temporal area (hMT+) responded to both human and macaque BM stimuli, while the right posterior superior temporal sulcus (hpSTS) exhibited selective responses to human BM stimuli. This selectivity is evidenced by an increased feedforward connection from hMT+ to hpSTS during the processing of human BM stimuli. In monkeys, the MT region processed BM stimuli from both species, but no subregion in the STS anterior to MT is specific to conspecific BM stimuli. A comparison of these findings suggests that upstream brain regions (i.e., MT) may retain homologous functions across species, while downstream brain regions (i.e., STS) may have undergone differentiation and specialization throughout evolution. These results provide insights into the commonalities and differences in the specialized visual pathway engaged in processing within- and cross-species BMs, as well as their functional divergence during evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.