ArticleBMC microbiology2025
Detection and co-occurrence of Acanthamoeba and Klebsiella pneumoniae in freshwater river systems of Taichung, Taiwan.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis study focuses on the detection and co-occurrence of Acanthamoeba and Klebsiella pneumoniae in freshwater river systems. Both microorganisms are known for their pathogenic potential, with Acanthamoeba capable of causing infections such as amoebic keratitis, and K. pneumoniae being a common cause of community infections. Understanding their presence and distribution in natural aquatic environments can provide insights into potential public health risks, especially in regions with significant human-water interactions.
methodWater samples were collected from five major hydrophilic environments in Taichung, Taiwan. Polymerase chain reaction assays were employed to detect the presence of Acanthamoeba and K. pneumoniae. In addition to microbial detection, environmental parameters, including temperature, pH, reactive oxygen species, and water hardness, were measured to assess their potential influence on microbial presence. Data analysis focused on identifying patterns of detection and co-occurrence between the two microorganisms.
resultsThe study revealed variable detection rates of both Acanthamoeba and K. pneumoniae across the five sampling sites. Co-occurrence of the two microorganisms was observed at several locations, indicating their potential interaction in the environment. While water quality parameters were measured, no strong correlation was found between these factors and microbial detection rates. The widespread distribution of both organisms highlights their resilience in diverse freshwater environments. However, this study did not include virulence factor analysis, and the role of environmental conditions in modulating bacterial pathogenicity remains speculative.
conclusionThis research demonstrates that Acanthamoeba and K. pneumoniae are both prevalent in the freshwater ecosystems of Taichung, Taiwan, with notable instances of co-occurrence. Although environmental parameters such as temperature and pH did not significantly influence detection rates, the presence of these organisms in frequently accessed water bodies may pose significant public health risks. Further research is necessary to explore the ecological interactions of these microorganisms and assess their potential impact on human health, particularly in regions with high human activity near freshwater sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.