ArticleBMC oral health2025
Restorative management of permanent teeth affected by molar incisor hypomineralization: a survey of dentists in Saudi Arabia.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enamel Defects Among Orphanage Children: A Multi-Country Case-Control Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
- What is the impact of stress on the development of molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH): a systematic review.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis electronic survey-based study aimed to explore the variations in treatment decisions made by dentists from different specialties in Saudi Arabia when treating anterior and posterior permanent teeth afflicted by molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH) of varying severity.
methodsA cohort of dental professionals, including general dentists, pediatric dentists, and restorative dentists/prosthodontists, participated in a validated electronic survey-based study between January and March 2023. The survey consisted of the following three sections: The first section collected demographic information from the participating dentists. The second part includes case scenarios and photographs of four clinical cases (two permanent first molars and two permanent incisors) diagnosed with MIH of varying degrees of severity. Following each case, the participants were asked to choose the treatment approach and final restorative material they preferred to manage the tooth in question. In the third part, participants were asked to select factors that influenced their treatment decisions.
resultsIn total, 109 dentists responded to the questionnaire. For posterior permanent molars with both mild and severe MIH, general dentists and restorative dentists/prosthodontics preferred resin-based composite restoration. In contrast, pediatric dentists considered stainless steel crowns (SSCs) as the preferred modality. Resin infiltration was the most common treatment chosen for permanent anterior teeth with mild MIH. Resin-based composite restorations were predominantly chosen for severe cases. Tooth prognosis and dentist experience were among the top cited factors influencing the decision of preferred treatment in cases of permanent first molars diagnosed with MIH, and aesthetics was the most considered factor in cases of permanent incisors diagnosed with MIH.
conclusionAccording to the survey, different dental specialties manage MIH cases differently depending on the severity and type of permanent tooth (anterior/posterior).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.