Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089691›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Effect of India's flagship conditional maternity benefit scheme on utilization of maternal and child health services: evidence from a statewide evaluation study.

Rupsa Banerjee, Bhanu Shanker Singh, Neha Sahrawat, Amit Mehrotra, Sumant Swain, Ram Manohar Mishra, Piush Antony, U Aparna, B K Jain, Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rupsa BanerjeeInternational Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Bhanu Shanker SinghInternational Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Neha SahrawatInternational Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Amit MehrotraUNICEF, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sumant SwainInternational Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Ram Manohar MishraUNICEF Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Piush AntonyUNICEF, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
U AparnaState Innovations in Family Planning Services Project Agency, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
B K JainState Innovations in Family Planning Services Project Agency, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sutapa Bandyopadhyay NeogiInternational Institute of Health Management Research, New Delhi, Delhi, India. sutapa@iihmrdelhi.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Pradhan Mantri Matru Vandana Yojana (PMMVY) is India's flagship Maternity Benefit Programme to improve maternal nutrition and child health. This study evaluates the functional status of the scheme, knowledge regarding the scheme and its effect on pattern of service utilization in a north Indian state.

methodsA three-pronged mixed-methods evaluation including household survey of beneficiary and non-beneficiary women, in-depth interviews of key stakeholders (district and state level program managers, program implementers and frontline workers) and review of secondary data from the PMMVY Common Application Software and state PMMVY dashboard was done. Household survey covered 1290 women, and 70 in-depth interviews were held with eligible women, and PMMVY managerial and implementation staff. Quantitative data was analysed using SPSS version 22.0, qualitative data was analysed thematically and triangulated with quantitative results for effective analysis and conclusion. The study received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board of IIHMR Delhi.

resultsA strong political commitment with requisite systems and resources across all levels was observed. Coverage of PMMVY was less in urban areas (53.1% as compared to overall coverage of 95.9%). Knowledge of the scheme was high among both beneficiary and non-beneficiary women (97.8% beneficiary women and 94.2% non-beneficiary women). Utilization of Maternal and Child Health (MCH) services were significantly poorer among non-beneficiary women for four antenatal check-ups (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.99, p = 0.04), childbirth registration (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.45, p < 0.001) and child immunization (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.55, p < 0001). However, certain operational challenges were found related to beneficiary enrolment and use of PMMVY software, and a gap in intended and actual use of PMMVY incentive was observed (26.2% beneficiary women had spent the cash incentive on needs not related to nutrition or health).

conclusionDespite operational challenges, PMMVY has been effective in improving the utilization of health services like antenatal check-ups, childbirth registration and child immunization. The benefits of the scheme may be maximized by addressing those limitations in its delivery.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesMaternal-Child Health ServicesMaternal Health ServicesPatient Acceptance of Health CareAdultFemaleHumansIndiaPregnancyProgram EvaluationYoung AdultAntenatal checkupBirth registrationConditional maternity benefit schemeFinancial schemeImmunizationLactating mothersMaternity benefit programPregnancy registrationPregnant women

Identifiers

PMID40089691
PMCPMC11910864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.