Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089630›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

The effect of 5% and 10% povidone-iodine antiseptic concentrations on postoperative sensorineural hearing loss in tympanoplasty: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial.

Mohammad Faramarzi, Ali Faramarzi, Sareh Roosta, Mahmoud Shishegar, Mohammadreza Khademalizadeh, Sara S Nabavizadeh, Amir Keyvan Sazgar

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Faramarzi *Otolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6903-3252
Ali Faramarzi *Otolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4814-1729
Sareh RoostaOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3927-0812
Mahmoud ShishegarOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran. dr.shishegar@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0423-4464
Mohammadreza KhademalizadehOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Sara S NabavizadehOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9055-030X
Amir Keyvan SazgarOtolaryngology Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Imam Khomeini Medical Complex, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7502-0183

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the ototoxicity of povidone iodine (PVP-I) at concentrations of 5% and 10% during tympanoplasty by assessing frequency-specific audiometric outcomes and graft success rates in a large cohort of patients.

methodsThis prospective, triple-blinded, randomized clinical trial enrolled 542 patients undergoing primary tympanoplasty. After excluding patients for inadequate follow-up, 204 ears received 10% PVP-I and 199 ears received 5% PVP-I. Audiometric evaluations, including bone conduction (BC), air conduction (AC), air-bone gap (ABG), and speech reception threshold (SRT), were conducted preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), defined as an increase in BC threshold of more than 10 dB. Secondary outcomes included graft success rate and audiometric gains.

resultsThe overall incidence of SNHL was 1.5% in the 10% PVP-I group and 1.0% in the 5% PVP-I group, with no significant difference (P = 1.000). In ears with preoperative mixed hearing loss, SNHL at 0.25 kHz was significantly higher in the 10% PVP-I group (28.9%) compared to the 5% PVP-I group (6.7%) (P = 0.002). Graft success rates were 94.1% and 97.0% in the 10% and 5% PVP-I groups, respectively (P = 0.164). No clinically significant differences in audiometric gains were observed between the groups.

conclusionBoth 5% and 10% PVP-I concentrations are safe for antiseptic preparation in tympanoplasty, as evidenced by low rates of SNHL and high graft success rates. These findings support the use of PVP-I in human otologic surgery without significant ototoxic risk.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective Agents, LocalHearing Loss, SensorineuralPostoperative ComplicationsPovidone-IodineTympanoplastyAdolescentAdultAgedAudiometryBone ConductionDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Infective Agents, LocalPovidone-IodineHearing lossOtotoxicityPovidone-iodineSensorineuralTympanoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.