Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025
The effect of 5% and 10% povidone-iodine antiseptic concentrations on postoperative sensorineural hearing loss in tympanoplasty: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the ototoxicity of povidone iodine (PVP-I) at concentrations of 5% and 10% during tympanoplasty by assessing frequency-specific audiometric outcomes and graft success rates in a large cohort of patients.
methodsThis prospective, triple-blinded, randomized clinical trial enrolled 542 patients undergoing primary tympanoplasty. After excluding patients for inadequate follow-up, 204 ears received 10% PVP-I and 199 ears received 5% PVP-I. Audiometric evaluations, including bone conduction (BC), air conduction (AC), air-bone gap (ABG), and speech reception threshold (SRT), were conducted preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. The primary outcome was the incidence of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), defined as an increase in BC threshold of more than 10 dB. Secondary outcomes included graft success rate and audiometric gains.
resultsThe overall incidence of SNHL was 1.5% in the 10% PVP-I group and 1.0% in the 5% PVP-I group, with no significant difference (P = 1.000). In ears with preoperative mixed hearing loss, SNHL at 0.25 kHz was significantly higher in the 10% PVP-I group (28.9%) compared to the 5% PVP-I group (6.7%) (P = 0.002). Graft success rates were 94.1% and 97.0% in the 10% and 5% PVP-I groups, respectively (P = 0.164). No clinically significant differences in audiometric gains were observed between the groups.
conclusionBoth 5% and 10% PVP-I concentrations are safe for antiseptic preparation in tympanoplasty, as evidenced by low rates of SNHL and high graft success rates. These findings support the use of PVP-I in human otologic surgery without significant ototoxic risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40089630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.