Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089626›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hierarchical multi step Gray Wolf optimization algorithm for energy systems optimization.

Idriss Dagal, Al-Wesabi Ibrahim, Ambe Harrison, Wulfran Fendzi Mbasso, Ahmad O Hourani, Ievgen Zaitsev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Idriss DagalElectrical Engineering, Beykent University, Ayazağa Mahallesi, Hadım Koruyolu Cd. No:19, Sarıyer, Istanbul, Turkey. idriss.dagal@std.yildiz.edu.tr.
Al-Wesabi IbrahimCollege of Electrical and Information Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, China.
Ambe HarrisonDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, College of Technology (COT), University of Buea, P.O. Box Buea 63, Buea, Cameroon.
Wulfran Fendzi MbassoTechnology and Applied Sciences Laboratory. U.I.T of Douala, University of Douala, P.O. Box 8689, Douala, Cameroon.
Ahmad O HouraniHourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.
Ievgen ZaitsevDepartment of Theoretical Electrical Engineering and Diagnostics of Electrical Equipment, Institute of Electrodynamics, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Beresteyskiy, 56, Kyiv-57, Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine. zaitsev@i.ua.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO), inspired by the social hierarchy and cooperative hunting behavior of gray wolves, is a widely used metaheuristic algorithm for solving complex optimization problems in various domains, including engineering design, image processing, and machine learning. However, standard GWO can suffer from premature convergence and sensitivity to parameter settings. To address these limitations, this paper introduces the Hierarchical Multi-Step Gray Wolf Optimization (HMS-GWO) algorithm. HMS-GWO incorporates a novel hierarchical decision-making framework that more closely mimics the observed hierarchical behavior of wolf packs, enabling each wolf type (Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omega) to execute a structured multi-step search process. This hierarchical approach enhances exploration and exploitation, improves solution diversity, and prevents stagnation. The performance of HMS-GWO is evaluated on a benchmark suite of 23 functions, showing a 99% accuracy, with a computational time of 3 s and a stability score of 0.9. Compared to other advanced optimization techniques such as standard GA, PSO, MMSCC-GWO, WCA, and CCS-GWO, HMS-GWO demonstrates significantly better performance, including faster convergence and improved solution accuracy. While standard GWO suffers from premature convergence, HMS-GWO mitigates this issue by employing a multi-step search process and better solution diversity. These results confirm that HMS-GWO outperforms other techniques in terms of both convergence speed and solution quality, making it a promising approach for solving complex optimization problems across various domains with enhanced robustness and efficiency.

Indexed as

Energy systems optimizationHierarchical optimizationMetaheuristicMulti-Objective optimizationPower system optimizationRenewable energy integration

Identifiers

PMID40089626
PMCPMC11910579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.