Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089606›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A comparison of art engagement in museums and through digital media.

Kohinoor M Darda, Vicente Estrada Gonzalez, Alexander P Christensen, Isabella Bobrow, Amy Krimm, Zuha Nasim, Eileen R Cardillo, William Perthes, Anjan Chatterjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kohinoor M Darda *Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. kohinoor@arisafoundation.org.
Vicente Estrada Gonzalez *Penn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Alexander P ChristensenPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Isabella BobrowPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Amy KrimmPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zuha NasimPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Eileen R CardilloPenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
William PerthesThe Barnes Foundation, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Anjan ChatterjeePenn Center for Neuroaesthetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As cultural consumption increasingly moves to a digital space, it is crucial to understand the evolving landscape of art consumption both in and outside of a physical museum context. The current study delves into this contrast, seeking to understand how art is perceived and appreciated in museums and on a digital medium (like a computer screen). Across two experiments at the Barnes Foundation and Penn Museum in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, we explored how the aesthetic engagement of paintings and artifacts is influenced by the physical context in which an artwork is encountered and by the characteristics of the viewer. Our findings suggest that the cognitive and emotional impacts of artworks on viewers, as well as the viewers' overall aesthetic experiences are comparable across physical museum spaces and digital platforms. However, participants reported gaining more understanding from art viewed in museums, compared to participants who viewed art in the lab. Art experience and openness to experience influenced aesthetic impacts and ratings differently in the museum and in the lab. Overall, routes to broader valuations of liking were more similar than different between the museum and lab contexts, whereas patterns of impacts that might lead to new knowledge or understanding gained differed between museum and lab contexts. As digital technologies are increasingly integrated into diverse processes in museums such as collections management, curation, exhibitions, and education and learning, our research highlights how museums can leverage digital expansion to achieve their missions as centers of learning and education.

Indexed as

AestheticsArtContextMuseumNeuroaesthetics

Identifiers

PMID40089606
PMCPMC11910631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.