Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089592›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

A mixed studies systematic review on the health and wellbeing effects, and underlying mechanisms, of online support groups for chronic conditions.

Freya Mills, John Drury, Charlotte E Hall, Dale Weston, Charles Symons, Richard Amlôt, Holly Carter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The psychology of health.Communications psychology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Freya MillsBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK. freya.mills@ukhsa.gov.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1174-6361
John DrurySchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Falmer, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7748-5128
Charlotte E HallBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3410-2569
Dale WestonBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5304-7572
Charles SymonsBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-9969
Richard AmlôtBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-6588
Holly CarterBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency, Salisbury, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2084-7263

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This pre-registered systematic review aimed to examine whether online support groups affect the health and wellbeing of individuals with a chronic condition, and what mechanisms may influence such effects. In September 2024, literature searches were conducted across electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Google Scholar), pre-publication websites (MedRxiv and PsyArXiv) and grey literature websites. Qualitative and quantitative studies were included if they explored the impact of online support groups on the health and wellbeing outcomes of individuals with a chronic condition. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. In total 100 papers met the inclusion criteria with their findings presented in a thematic synthesis. Health and wellbeing outcomes were categorised as: physical health, mental health, quality of life, social wellbeing, behaviour and decision-making, and adjustment. Mechanisms reported in these studies related to exchanging support, sharing experiences, content expression, and social comparison. User and group characteristics were also explored. The included studies suggest that online support groups can have a positive impact on social wellbeing, behaviour, and adjustment, with inconclusive findings for physical health and quality of life. However, there is also the possibility of a negative effect on anxiety and distress, particularly when exposed to other group members' difficult experiences. Research comparing different online group features, such as platforms, size, and duration is needed. In particular, future research should be experimental to overcome the limitations of some of the cross-sectional designs of the included studies. The review was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research in Emergency Preparedness and Response. Pre-registration ID: CRD42023399258.

Identifiers

PMID40089592
PMCPMC11910600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.