Observational studyScientific reports2025
An innovative approach based on health surveillance for the prevention and early detection of cardiovascular diseases in a large cohort of healthcare workers.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Wrist-based wearable oscillometric blood pressure monitoring during Ramadan: a comparative study with standard devices.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of our three-year retrospective observational study on 6000 healthcare workers, all subjected to mandatory health surveillance, is to determine the risk factors and prevalence of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and to analyze the results of an ad hoc designated preventive health surveillance protocol. A risk assessment was performed and a preventive health surveillance protocol was implemented, including clinical-instrumental and laboratory tests aimed at the early detection of any sign of CVD. As a result, n = 442 new diagnoses of CVDs were made and the prevalence of CVDs increased from 12 to 16.1%. The higher prevalence was observed in physicians (P = 57.8%; p < 0.0001). The main risk factors for CVDs were age, male sex and family history of CVDs. The analysis of CVDs determinants highlighted an unexpected protective role of shift work (aOR = 0.64; p < 0.0001). Our preventive health surveillance protocol allowed to reveal a high prevalence of undiagnosed CVDs, laying the foundations for future primary prevention and counseling interventions as part of the health promotion and TOTAL WORKER HEALTH programs. Further studies are needed to create solid scientific evidence that can guide public health decisions regarding new prevention models and health promotion programs also in the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.