ArticleScientific reports2025
Empagliflozin demonstrates neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects by reducing ischemia/reperfusion damage in rat models of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dapagliflozin pretreatment attenuates focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Organ-Specific Efficacy of Postischemic Empagliflozin in Acute Stroke and Myocardial Infarction Using Preclinical Models.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Astrocytic SIRT3 Alleviates Neuroinflammatory Responses After Cerebral Ischemia/reperfusion by Inhibiting the cGAS-STING Pathway.Inflammation · 2026Article
- Exploring the Effects of Empagliflozin Administration and Physical Training on Cognitive Functions in an Amyloid Beta-Induced Alzheimer's Rat Model.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors: An Emerging Therapeutic Approach for Ischemic Stroke Management.CNS drugs · 2025Review
- Targeting Neurodegeneration with SGLT2is: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Implications.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- A new hybrid echocardiography and arterial pressure waveform approach for non-invasive reconstruction of the entire left ventricular pressure waveform.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Assessment of Myocardial Injury Size Metrics Using Carotid Pressure Waveform: Proof-of-Concept in Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Rat Model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated potential neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects in preliminary studies. This study evaluates the efficacy of empagliflozin (EMPA) in reducing ischemia/reperfusion damage in both the brain and heart using rat models. Ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) were induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were randomized into three groups: (1) Control (no EMPA), (2) Acute treatment (EMPA, 10 mg/kg IV, administered 10 min before ischemia and 1 min before reperfusion), and (3) Chronic treatment (EMPA, 20 mg/kg in food for 7 days before ischemia). Stroke was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for one hour, followed by 3 h of reperfusion, and MI was induced by left coronary artery occlusion for 30 min, followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Brain and heart tissues were analyzed for anatomic size of myocardial infarction and stroke. In the brain, cerebral infarction was significantly smaller in both EMPA treatment groups compared to controls (acute: 3.7 ± 1.2%, chronic: 6.9 ± 2.1% vs. control: 14.5 ± 2.5%, p < 0.05). Edema was also reduced in the EMPA groups (acute: 5.5 ± 0.9%, chronic: 5.9 ± 0.8% vs. control: 9.6 ± 1.2%, p < 0.05). In the heart, MI size was significantly reduced in both EMPA groups (acute: 46.9 ± 2.0%, chronic: 48.8 ± 5.8% vs. control: 70.0 ± 2.6%, p < 0.05), and no-reflow size was smaller in the EMPA groups (acute: 36.3 ± 3.3%, chronic: 33.9 ± 4.3% vs. control: 53.4 ± 3.3%, p < 0.05). EMPA treatment, both acute and chronic, significantly reduces cerebral infarct volume and edema, as well as myocardial infarct size and no-reflow in rat models of ischemic stroke and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, indicating substantial neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.