Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089564›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Empagliflozin demonstrates neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects by reducing ischemia/reperfusion damage in rat models of ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction.

Wangde Dai, Rashid Alavi, Jiajun Li, Juan Carreno, Niema M Pahlevan, Robert A Kloner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of Myocardial Injury Size Metrics Using Carotid Pressure Waveform: Proof-of-Concept in Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Rat Model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Wangde DaiHuntington Medical Research Institutes, HMRI Cardiovascular Research Institute, 686 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA. wangdedai@yahoo.com.
Rashid AlaviHuntington Medical Research Institutes, HMRI Cardiovascular Research Institute, 686 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA.
Jiajun LiDepartment of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern California, 3650 McClintock Ave. Room 400, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Juan CarrenoHuntington Medical Research Institutes, HMRI Cardiovascular Research Institute, 686 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA.
Niema M PahlevanHuntington Medical Research Institutes, HMRI Cardiovascular Research Institute, 686 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA.
Robert A KlonerHuntington Medical Research Institutes, HMRI Cardiovascular Research Institute, 686 South Fair Oaks Avenue, Pasadena, CA, 91105, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated potential neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects in preliminary studies. This study evaluates the efficacy of empagliflozin (EMPA) in reducing ischemia/reperfusion damage in both the brain and heart using rat models. Ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) were induced in male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were randomized into three groups: (1) Control (no EMPA), (2) Acute treatment (EMPA, 10 mg/kg IV, administered 10 min before ischemia and 1 min before reperfusion), and (3) Chronic treatment (EMPA, 20 mg/kg in food for 7 days before ischemia). Stroke was induced by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) for one hour, followed by 3 h of reperfusion, and MI was induced by left coronary artery occlusion for 30 min, followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Brain and heart tissues were analyzed for anatomic size of myocardial infarction and stroke. In the brain, cerebral infarction was significantly smaller in both EMPA treatment groups compared to controls (acute: 3.7 ± 1.2%, chronic: 6.9 ± 2.1% vs. control: 14.5 ± 2.5%, p < 0.05). Edema was also reduced in the EMPA groups (acute: 5.5 ± 0.9%, chronic: 5.9 ± 0.8% vs. control: 9.6 ± 1.2%, p < 0.05). In the heart, MI size was significantly reduced in both EMPA groups (acute: 46.9 ± 2.0%, chronic: 48.8 ± 5.8% vs. control: 70.0 ± 2.6%, p < 0.05), and no-reflow size was smaller in the EMPA groups (acute: 36.3 ± 3.3%, chronic: 33.9 ± 4.3% vs. control: 53.4 ± 3.3%, p < 0.05). EMPA treatment, both acute and chronic, significantly reduces cerebral infarct volume and edema, as well as myocardial infarct size and no-reflow in rat models of ischemic stroke and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, indicating substantial neuroprotective and cardioprotective effects.

Indexed as

Benzhydryl CompoundsCardiotonic AgentsGlucosidesIschemic StrokeMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial Reperfusion InjuryNeuroprotective AgentsReperfusion InjuryAnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsBenzhydryl CompoundsCardiotonic AgentsempagliflozinGlucosidesNeuroprotective AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsCardioprotective effectsEmpagliflozinIschemic strokeMyocardial infarctionNeuroprotectionSodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID40089564
PMCPMC11910632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.