Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40089545›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Effectiveness of machine learning methods in detecting grooming: a systematic meta-analytic review.

Marcelo Leiva-Bianchi, Nicolas Castillo, César A Astudillo, Francisco Ahumada-Méndez

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcelo Leiva-BianchiLaboratory of Methodology, Behavior and Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Talca, Chile.
Nicolas CastilloDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Talca, Chile.
César A AstudilloDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering, Talca, Chile. castudillo@utalca.cl.
Francisco Ahumada-MéndezLaboratory of Methodology, Behavior and Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Talca, Chile.

Funding

This work is supported in part by funds from the FONDECYT-Chile N° 1190578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) on the use of machine learning (ML) methods for detecting online grooming, a form of manipulation and child sexual abuse. The SR identified 33 studies from IEEE, Web of Science, Scopus, Springer, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, and 11 ML methods were meta-analyzed for accuracy (ACC), precision (P), recall (R), and [Formula: see text] Score (F1). Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) demonstrated the highest accuracy (ACC=92%, p<0.001) and precision (P=81%, p<0.001), excelling in capturing complex, nonlinear patterns essential for analyzing nuanced online interactions. Support Vector Machine (SVM), with an ACC of 88% (p<0.001), achieved a balanced performance, characterized by high precision (P=86%, p<0.001), recall (R=74%, p<0.001), and the highest F1 score (0.79). SVM emerges as an effective algorithm, providing a robust balance across all metrics, emphasizing its adaptability and reliability in detecting nuanced grooming behaviors. This study is pioneering in meta-analyzing ML methods applied to the effectiveness in detecting grooming. The results highlight the efficacy of certain algorithms and contribute to the identification of online predators. A crucial aspect of cybersecurity for preventing child sexual abuse.

Indexed as

Child Abuse, SexualMachine LearningAlgorithmsChildHumansSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID40089545
PMCPMC11910598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.