ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal machine learning for deception detection using behavioral and physiological data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structured multi-domain EEG descriptors with phase-based connectivity for lie and truth detection.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Decoding concealed information using multimodal neurophysiological signals.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning with SHAP predicts honest behavior from personality traits and physiological data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deception Detection from Five-Channel Wearable EEG on LieWaves: A Reproducible Baseline for Subject-Dependent and Subject-Independent Evaluation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable multimodal machine learning for injury risk stratification in adolescent athletes: integrating kinematic, physiological, and load data with SHAP/LIME explainability.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- HMDF-Net: a transfer learning-based heterogeneous multimodal dynamic fusion network for depression detection among inmates in correctional facilities.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deception detection is crucial in domains like national security, privacy, judiciary, and courtroom trials. Differentiating truth from lies is inherently challenging due to many complex, diversified behavioural, physiological and cognitive aspects. Traditional lie detector tests (polygraphs) have been widely used but remain controversial due to scientific, ethical, and practical concerns. With advancements in machine learning, deception detection can be automated. However, existing secondary datasets are limited-they are small, unimodal, and predominantly based on non-Indian populations. To address these gaps, we present CogniModal-D, a primary real-world multimodal dataset for deception detection, specifically targeting the Indian population. It spans seven modalities-electroencephalography (EEG), electrocardiography (ECG), electrooculography (EOG), eye-gaze, galvanic skin response (GSR), audio, and video-collected from over 100 subjects. The data was gathered through tasks focused on social relationships and controlled mock crime interrogations. Our multimodal AI-based score-level fusion approach integrates diverse verbal and nonverbal cues, significantly improving deception detection accuracy compared to unimodal methods. Performance improvements of up to 15% were observed in mock crime and best friend scenarios with multimodal fusion. Notably, behavioural modalities (audio, video, gaze, GSR) proved more robust than neurophysiological ones (EEG, ECG, EOG).The study demonstrates that multimodal features offer superior discriminatory power in deception detection. These insights highlight the pivotal role of integrating multiple modalities to develop robust, scalable, and advanced deception detection systems in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.